Pages

Thursday, 2 October 2014

Pros and cons of Suzuki violin method

This method of teaching violin originated from Japanese violinist Shinichi Suzuki (1898–1998) in the mid-20th century, As he realized that learn to speak their native language with ease, he utilised this basic principle of language acquisition to the learning of music, music being another language. 

Below is an article reproduced from this site which lists the pros and cons of the Suzuki method:

Early beginning. Students begin very early, even as young as age 3.
Pros
1. The early years are often considered prime for developing muscle coordination and mental processing.
2. Children may have a greater chance of quickly learning an instrument.
Cons
1. Some educators believe children age 3-5 is too young to begin violin since the student may not really understand what is going on. Coupled with the high demand for structured practice, this may be detrimental in their musical progress. 

Suzuki violin method uses common repertoire and a standardized curriculum.
Pros
1. This enables group practice and performance because all the students play the same songs.
2. For a home with multiple Suzuki students this can ease financial burden of buying books as each sibling uses the same materials.
Cons
1. Many of the Suzuki songs used are of the same style and time period. Unless a Suzuki teacher is flexible and supplements with outside material, students will be limited in their playing styles.
2. Although non-competitiveness and positive peer interaction is encouraged, it might be easy for students to compare themselves to others around them who are playing in the same books but are further ahead than themselves.

Review of past Suzuki songs takes the place of the traditional etude or theory books.
Suzuki believed that every technical problem or difficulty that a student needs to learn can be taught right in the context of their song book repertoire. Repetition and review is key in the Suzuki violin method to mastering songs and moving on to the next level.
Pros
1. Repeating and reviewing music can serve as wonderful building blocks to new music.
2. Constant review of music facilitates group lessons and performance.
3. Going back to the basics (simpler, familiar music) allows students to easily work on the fundamentals of proper form, technique, and intonation.
4. Etude and theory books can sometimes be non-motivating for children. Learning technique under the guise of a fun song is much more appealing and motivating for children.
Cons
1. Students may miss out on building a repertoire of many wonderful and useful etudes that have been written for the exact purpose of teaching students a specific technique.
2. Although reviewed frequently, repetition of techniques may not be enough in the context of a fun song. Etudes are designed to give student ample practice by repeating a specific technique over and over again.
3. Etudes give variety to practice and lesson time, and can serve as wonderful warm-ups.

Suzuki Students practice and perform frequently in a group setting.
Pros
1. It is beneficial for students to hear and see other students playing the violin, especially playing the music and songs they themselves are learning.
2. When playing in a group, a student learns valuable skills; keeping perfect rhythm and beat, following a leader, and to keep playing or 'catch up' when they make a mistakes.
3. Students meet and become friends with other youth that have a common interest in music.
4. Students become very comfortable in performing with their group. Performing becomes a non-stressful, enjoyable event.
Cons
1. Depending on the size and playing ability of the group, certain techniques of a student when played poorly, like intonation and proper form, may go unnoticed and uncorrected by a teacher.
2. Student may develop a tendency of robotic playing at the expense of their individual musicianship.
3. Performing always as a group may make a student dependent on the ability of others to perform. As a result, they may not develop the ability to perform as well as a soloist.

Suzuki violin method teaches students how to play violin by ear (listening to recordings and other violinists), not by reading music.
Pros
1. Students develop a strong ear. This means they are able to listen to music and replicate it.
2. When students do begin learning note reading they have already developed the ability to hear phrasing and predict the melodic direction of a song.
Cons
1. Learning music first by ear and later by note reading may compromise sight reading ability.
2. Students may develop the tendency to be dependent on others and not take ownership of their practicing and learning.
3. Students may struggle to develop their own style and interpretation of music because they are always copying others, and recordings.

Parents are very involved at lessons. They take notes and attend every lesson. They then become the at-home violin teacher.
Pros
1. For the very youngest students, parental involvement is necessary.
2. Parental involvement boosts student's self-esteem and confidence.
3. Parent helps student to stay on track during the week and make practice time more effective between lessons.
Cons
1. Students may become slack in taking responsibility and listening to their violin teacher if their parent is always taking notes at lessons and directing their practicing at home.
2. Students may be less likely to take ownership for their own learning, and as result could lack intrinsic motivation.
3. Older students may become dependent on teaching styles better suited for younger students.


My take is that I will choose the Suzuki method to start my child on the instrument. Due to the strong parental involvement, it also encourages the child’s sense of security and promotes bonding. The delayed reading 3 allows the students to focus on learning the instrument in entirety without having to struggle with note reading at the same time.

List of centres in Singapore that use the Suzuki Violin method:
Other centres that teach violin to preschoolers

No comments:

Post a Comment